The High Court of Madras dismissed W.P.No.36610 of 2006 for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to attend the hearing, leading to the withdrawal of the writ petition seeking quashing of an order and re-assignment of land.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:25.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.36610 of 2006
K.Velayuthan ... Petitioner
Vs.
Erode-638 002.
Palladam Taluk, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to th order of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.M.R.4/450/C4 dated 25.03.2002 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to re-assign the lands in S.No.63 of an extent of 0.80 Acres in Kalangai Village, Palladam Taluk, Coimbatore District.
For Petitioner : No appearance.
For Respondents: Mr.P.R.Dilipkumar
Standing Counsel (TNEB)
When the matter was listed on 19.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence the matter was posted on 23.07.2019. Again on 23.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption of “For Dismissal” on 25.07.2019. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS)
Sub Assistant Registrar
rm
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner (Land reforms) No.58, Thanga Perumal Street, Ambal Kalyana Mandapam, Erode-638 002.
W.P.No.36610 of 2006
ad (CO) A.SK(27/08/2019)
K.Velayuthan
The Assistant Commissioner (Land reforms)
The Village Administrative Officer
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
