Dismissed

P. Kannammal v. the Branch Manager

Madras HC17 Jun 2019WP/17783/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for waiver of agricultural loans under the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008. The Court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous on the submission that the petitioner had repaid the entire amount and the account was closed.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No Costs.

P. Kannammal Vs the Branch Manager — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 17.06.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P.No.17783 of 2009 and MP.No.1 of 2009

¶6

P.Kannammal ..Petitioner

¶7

Vs
1. The Branch Manager,
Canara Bank,
Thekkalur Branch,
Tirupur District 641 564.
2. Divisional Manager,
Canara Bank,
AF & PS Section,
Circle Office,
No.166, T.V.Samy Road (West),
R.S.Puram, Coimbatore 641 012.
3. National Level Monitoring Committee,
Rep. by its Chairperson, Secretary,
Dept. of Financial Services,
Ministry of Finance,
New Delhi.
4. The Tahsildar,
Tahsildar Office,
Palladam Taluk,
Tirupur District. ..Respondents

¶8

Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to waive the petitioner's entire, agricultural loans along with their interest in KCCS No.4498, ALGL No.4452, ALGL No.4384 and AL Dairy No.4428 in the respondent's Bank, Thekkalur Branch under the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008.

¶9

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.Parthasarathy, for RR1 & 2 No Appearance, for R3 Ms.M.Lalitha, G.A., for R4

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to waive her entire agricultural loans along with interest in the respondent-Bank, Thekkalur Branch under the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008.

¶13

Mr.Kavi Ramalingam, learned counsel for the petitioner would state that they have already given change of vakalat to the petitioner.

¶14

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank would state that the petitioner had repaid the entire amount and thereafter, her account was closed.

¶15

In view of the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank, nothing survives for consideration in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶16

Sd/Assistant Registrar(Insp.cell) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To 1. The Chairperson, Secretary, National Level Monitoring Committee, Dept. of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 2. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Palladam Taluk, Tirupur District.

¶17

+1cc to Government Pleader, High Court, SR.No.49154

¶18

W.P.No.17783 of 2009 VG II(CO) GMY(12/07/2019)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Kannammal v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Kannammal v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Quaide Milleth Educatinal and Vs the Director of Collegiate

Quaid Milleth Educational and Vs the Inspector General of

Sical Logistics Limited Vs Union of India

Ani, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Poongundran Vs the District Collector

E.S.Malarvizhi Vs v.Madusudanan