G.Parthasarthi v. the Andipalayam Panchayat, Rep
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.No.16100 of 2007 M.DHANDAPANI, J. At the…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.16100 of 2007
W.P.No.16100 of 2007
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
At the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this
matter has been posted under the caption “for being mentioned”.
- The sixth paragraph of the order dated 29.07.2019 in W.P.No.16100 of 2007 shall read as follows:
“At the time of filing the writ petition, the first respondent is the Village Panchayat and the second respondent is the Ward Member and the third respondent at that time, the Commissioner, Tiruppur Panchayat Union. During the pendency of the above writ petition, the Andipalayam Village Panchayat, the first respondent herein has been included within the city limit of Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation on 06.01.2011. Accordingly, the respondents 1 to 3 hereinafter are called Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation. On perusal of the entire records, it is seen that 1004 plots were approved in the year 1983 and 13 plots in question were approved in the year 1986 by the fifth respondent. The above said approval was made by the fifth respondent at the instance of the fourth respondent. In view of the subsequent development of the first respondent being merged with the Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation, the Commissioner, Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation is now
1/3
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court