Petitioner sought subsistence allowance during his suspension in a writ petition. The court permitted withdrawal of the petition and dismissed it accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :26.09.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.10764 of 2019
M.Jayaraj
... Petitioner
Versus
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC), B-4, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai North District, Chennai – 600 058.
... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other form of writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ directing the respondent to pay subsistence allowance for the period of suspension from 23.02.2019 to the petitioner.
When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to this effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)
1
bkn
To
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC), B-4, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai North District, Chennai – 600 058.
+1cc to Mr.V.Rajinikanth, Advocate SR.82712 +1cc to Mr.Arumugarajan, Advocate SR.82953
W.P.No.10764 of 2019
AD(CO) CB(19/11/2019)
2
M.Jayaraj
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC)
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
