Disposed

K.Rajendran v. the Regional Passport Officer

Madras HC13 Dec 2019WP/13254/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the Court directed the Inspector of Police to complete the pending investigation into an FIR registered against the petitioner regarding an accident within a specified deadline. The Court also directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for passport issuance.

What did the court decide?

The investigating officer was directed to complete the investigation on or before 31.01.2020; the petitioner was directed to submit a fresh representation for passport issuance.

K.Rajendran Vs the Regional Passport Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 13.12.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

W.P.No.13254 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.13365 of 2019

¶6

K.Rajendran .. Petitioner

¶7

..Vs..

¶8

The Regional Passport Officer,

¶9

Rayala Towers No.2 and 3, Fourth Floor, Old No.785, New No.158,

¶10

Anna Salai,

¶11

Chennai – 600 002.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, B-8, Pulrampakkam Police Station, Thiruvallur District. .. Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 26.07.2017 in file No.MA1069553020916 issued by the 1^st respondent and to quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to issue the passport to the petitioner forthwith.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.N.Inbanathan (for R2) Additional Government Pleader Mrs.Swarnalatha (for R1) Standing counsel

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The status report has been filed by the 2^nd respondent/the Inspector of Police, B-8, Pulrampakkam police station, Thiruvallur District that an FIR in crime No.215 of 2016 under Section 279 and 337 of IPC has been registered. It is stated that the investigation is pending.

¶18

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

It is stated that MV report has been received and the wound certificate is yet to be received.

¶21

In view of the above, the Inspector of Police, B-8,

¶22

Pulrampakkam police station, Thiruvallur District is directed to complete the investigation on or before 31.01.2020. He must be aware that he has kept the investigation pending more than three years. Any further delay will not be accepted by this Court. Independently, the petitioner may also give afresh representation for his passport and the 1^st respondent may consider it in accordance with law.

¶23

With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

vum

¶29

¶30

The Regional Passport Officer,

¶31

Rayala Towers No.2 and 3, Fourth Floor,

¶32

Old No.785, New No.158,

¶33

Anna Salai,

¶34

Chennai – 600 002.

¶35

The Inspector of Police,

¶36

B-8, Pulrampakkam Police Station,

¶37

Thiruvallur District.

¶38

The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

¶39

+1cc to Mr.C.Prabakaran, Advocate SR.104234 +1cc to the Government Pleader SR.104537

¶40

W.P.No.13254 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.13365 of 2019

¶41

CA(CO) CB(17/12/2019)

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

K.Rajendran v. the Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Rajendran v. the Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rathinam Vs The District Collector

Govindammal Vs The District Collector

K.P.Santhosh Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

T. Jayakumar Vs The District Collector

Talib Ali Vs M.S.Rehane Yaver Dhala

G.Subramanian Vs The Commissioner