Disposed

K.P.Santhosh v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Madras HC12 Dec 2019WP/11679/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a stay on police interference with the petitioner's proposed SPA Health Centre. The court directed the petitioner to apply for a license and the respondents to inspect and report to the District Collector as per rules.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to apply for a license directed respondents to inspect and report to District Collector for necessary orders.

K.P.Santhosh Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 12.12.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

W.P.No.11679 of 2019

¶6

K.P.Santhosh .. Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Erode Taluk, Erode District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Surampatti Police Station, Erode. .. Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents or their men, agents and officials interfering with the SPA Health Centre, functioning at No.9/11, Perundurai Road, opposite to Sudha Hospitals, Erode District-638 001 in any manner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.03.2019.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Vijaya Basker For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy Special Government Pleader. O R D E R

¶9

This petition has been filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents namely, the Superintendent of Police, Erode District, and Inspector of Police, Surampatti Police Station, Erode District, from interfering with with the SPA Health Centre, functioning at No.9/11, Perundurai Road, opposite to Sudha Hospitals, Erode District-638 001.

¶10

It is stated that the petitioner has made arrangements to open SPA Health Centre, functioning at No.9/11, Perundurai Road, opposite to Sudha Hospitals, Erode District-638 001.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

It is stated by the respondents that obtaining a license is mandatory for running a Massage Parlour. For obtaining license necessarily there shall have to be a verification by the police.

¶13

Therefore, both the petitioner and respondents will have to follow the rules. The petitioner will have to apply for license. The respondents are an obligation to Inspect, give a report to the District Collector. The District Collector will have to pass orders. Consequently, with these observations giving liberty to the petitioner to apply for a license and direction to the respondents to act in accordance with the rules and for the District Collector to pass necessary orders, the Writ Petition is disposed.

¶14

With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No Costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsn To, 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Erode Taluk, Erode District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Surampatti Police Station, Erode. +1cc to M/s.Law Vision , Advocate SR.No. 163567 +1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 104531

¶15

W.P.No.11679 of 2019 nmi A.SK(27/01/2020)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.P.Santhosh v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.P.Santhosh v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.M.Narayanan, Vs The District Collector

R.Latha Vs The District Colletor

G.Kousalya Vs The Inspector General

M.Rathinam Vs The District Collector

Govindammal Vs The District Collector

K.Prakash Vs The Commissioner of Geology