B.Ramalingam v. P.Viswanathan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, the High Court of Madras dismissed the appeal on default due to non-appearance of appellants at the last hearing.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 23.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.1867 of 2000
- B.Ramalingam 2. R.Chendamaraiammal ... Appellants
Vs.
1. P.Viswanathan
- The Superintendent Engineer,
T.N.E.B, Tiruvannamalai,
Tiruvannamalai District.
- The Divisional Engineer,
T.N.E.B, Arani Road,
Vandavasi Town.
- Thirumavalavan
(R4 impleaded vide Order of Court
dated 05.04.2019 made in
CMP.No.309 of 2015
in S.A.No.1867 of 2000) ... Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Arani in A.S.No.32 of 1995 dated 24.04.1998 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Arani in O.S.No.753 of 1991 dated 23.01.1995.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance for R2 and R3 : Mr.M.Elayaraj for R4 R1 : Died vide order dated 18/12/2018 (in CMP.309/15)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B.Ramalingam
- appellant
R.Chendamaraiammal
- respondent
P.Viswanathan
- respondent
The Superintendent Engineer, T.N.E.B, Tiruvannamalai
- respondent
The Divisional Engineer, T.N.E.B, Arani Road
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court