This is a second appeal where the appellant was absent at the hearing. The appeal was dismissed for default, granting no costs and closing connected petitions.
Second appeal dismissed for default with no costs; connected petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 15.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.1503 of 1999
K.Subramaniam ... Appellant
Vs.
Sri Varasithi Vinayagar
South Ukkadam
rep.by its Trustee
M.Palanisamy Chettiar ... Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree dated 16.04.1999 made in AS.No.28 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.11.1998 made in O.S.No.2237 of 1991 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that he is reporting no instructions for the appellant. Memo recorded. The
2
Vv
P.RAJAMANICKAM.J.,
appellant called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions if any,
stand closed.
15.04.2019
Vv
To
1. The Principal District Court,
Coimbatore,
2. The III Additional District Munsif,
Coimbatore.
3. The Section Officer, VR Section,
High Court, Madras.
S.A.No.1503 of 1999
3
4
5
15.04.2019
6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Subramaniam
Sri Varasithi Vinayagar South Ukkadam
M.Palanisamy Chettiar
P.RAJAMANICKAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
