Partly allowed

R.Sankar v. a.Alaguraj

Madras HC22 Apr 2019CRL OP(MD)/2577/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of an application to cancel anticipatory bail. The court dismissed the cancellation plea but directed the respondent to deposit Rs. 2,50,000 in court pending before the Judicial Magistrate within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Cancellation of anticipatory bail application dismissed; Respondent directed to deposit Rs. 2,50,000 within eight weeks.

R.Sankar Vs a.Alaguraj — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.04.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2577 of 2019

¶7

R.Sankar .. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.A.Alaguraj

¶10

2.State Through Inspector of Police, DCB, Virudhunagar. Crime No.2 of 2018. .. Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C., to cancel the impugned order of an anticipatory bail granted in favour of the first respondent in Crime No.2 of 2018, on the file of the District Crime Branch, Virudhunagar by the learned Principal Sessions Judge of Virudhunagar District in Srivilliputhur in Cr.M.P.No.4415 of 2018, dated 01.11.2018, direct the first respondent to be arrested and committed to custody.

¶12

For Petitioner: Mr.S.Mahalakshmi

¶13

For R-1 : Mr.A.Balaji For R-2 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to cancel the impugned order of anticipatory bail granted in favour of the first respondent in Crime No.2 of 2018, on the file of the District Crime Branch, Virudhunagar by the learned Principal Sessions Judge of Virudhunagar District in Srivilliputhur in Cr.M.P.No.4415 of 2018, dated 01.11.2018, and to direct the second respondent to arrest the first respondent.

¶16

The first respondent herein is arrayed as A7 in this case. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is one of the complainant as well as victim in this case. He parted Rs.5,50,000/- to the first respondent. The first respondent along with other accused persons cheated more than one crore for securing job and thereby he filed a complaint before the respondent police. The petitioner herein collected money from the victims and handed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ over to A8 and thereafter A8 has transferred the said amount to other accused.

¶17

¶18

The learned counsel for the first respondent would submit that the allegations levelled against him is that he has paid the amount to A8, in which he is not responsible for anything. However without prejudice to his right, he is ready to deposit Rs.2,50,000/to the credit in crime number 2 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Virudhunagar, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Viruthunagar.

¶19

Considering the request made by the learned counsel for the first respondent, this Cancellation of anticipatory bail applications stands dismissed. However, the first respondent is directed to deposit the said amount within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

/ True Copy /

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

¶25

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.

¶26

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar.

¶27

3.The Inspector of Police,

¶28

DCB, Virudhunagar.

¶29

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.A.BALAJI, Advocate ( SR-61553[F] dated 22/04/2019 )

¶31

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2577 of 2019 22.04.2019

¶32

ES/SP/29.04.2019/2P/6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Sankar v. a.Alaguraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Sankar v. a.Alaguraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Pappathi, W/O.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Maria Suji, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

1. Pappal Vs Kuttiappa Gounder(Deceased)

Selvakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Subramaniam. Vs Sri Varasithi Vinayagar South

Kandaswamy, Vs 1.P.PACHA Gounder