In a civil revision petition under section 115 CPC, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court closed the petition due to lack of instructions from the petitioner and hearing on the representation that the underlying suit had been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD) No.135 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28.11.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.135 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
Vedhanarayanan
... Petitioner/4th defendant
-vs-
1.Jeganathan (Died) 2.N.M.A.Narayana Konar (Died) 3.Saraswathi (Died)
5.Radhakrishnan
... Respondent/5th plaintiff
6.Sakunthala
7.Rajalakshmi
8.Manivannan
9.Rajalakshmi
10.Janarthanam
11.Vinoth Kumar
12.Revathi ... Respondents/Plaintiffs 6-12 13.C.Kaliannan 14.K.Chellappan ...Respondents/proposed respondents13& 14
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.12.2010 in I.A.No.610/2008 in O.S.No.238/2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Karur.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan For Respondent : Mr.V.Perumal for R6
Mr.B.Saravanan for R13 & R14 Mr.S.Deenadayalan for R9 to R12
O R D E R
When the Civil Revision Petition was taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the sixth respondent that the suit itself has been disposed of.
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
C.R.P.(MD) No.135 of 2012
RR
To
The Additional District Munsif, Karur.
+1CC TO Mr.K.Govindarajan, Advocate, Sr.No.102879
C.R.P.(PD) (MD)No.135 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 28.11.2019
SMA/02/01/2020/2P/3C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vedhanarayanan
Radhakrishnan
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
