The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as infructuous. The court recorded the submission that the sought prayer had become infructuous and ordered no costs.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1158 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28.11.2019
CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1158 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
1.P.Kumaresan
2.K.Parameswari
3.K.Naveenkumar ... Petitioners/Respondents 2to4/ Opposite party 2 to 4
-vs-
Natarajan ...Respondent/Petitioner/ complainant
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in E.A.No.90 of 2008 in C.C.No.166 of 2007 on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Theni dated 28.11.2008.
For Petitioners : Mr.H.Velavadhas
When the Civil Revision Petition was taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the prayer that has been sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1158 of 2012
RR
To
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Theni
C.R.P.(PD) (MD)No.1158 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 28.11.2019
KM/(06.01.2020) 2P 2C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition under Article 227 has become infructuous.
Whether the prayer in the revision against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum can be maintained.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Kumaresan
K. Parameswari
K. Naveenkumar
Natarajan
S. Vaideyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
