Saraswathi v. Rajamani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed two civil revision petitions as infructuous after learning that the underlying suit had been dismissed for default, rendering the sought relief unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
Both Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
C.R.P.PD.Nos. 869 & 870 of 2014
Saraswathi .... Petitioner in
both CRPs
Vs
1. Rajamani
2. Nataraj
Krishnaraj (Died)
3. Sundharajan
4. Bangajam
5. Kasthuri .... Respondents in
both CRPs
COMMON PRAYER : Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., to set aside the fair and final order dated 18.11.2013 passed in I.A.Nos.604 and 605 of 2012 in I.A.No.290 of 2012 in O.S.No.310 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Gobichettipalayam.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Lokesh
for Ma.P.Thangavel
For Respondents
For R1, R4 : No appearance
For R2 : Died
For R3 : Mr.A.Vivek
For R5 : Not ready in notice
C O M M O N O R D E R
These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the order dated 18.11.2013 made in I.A.Nos.604 and 605 of 2012 in I.A.No.290 of 2012 in O.S.No.310 of 2002, on the file of the District Munsif Court, http://www.judis.nic.in Gobichettipalayam.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the relief sought in civil revision petitions filed to set aside orders passed in a suite dismissed for default has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saraswathi
- respondent
Rajamani
Coram
R. Pongiappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court