Govindasamy v. R.Annamalai Died
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners were not represented on their hearing date.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD)No.2219 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 24.10.2019
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
C.R.P.(NPD)No.2219 of 2008
and M.P.No.1 of 2008
1.Govindasamy
2.Deivanayaki
3.Kumutha .. Petitioners /
Plaintiffs 6 to 8
versus
R.Annamalai (died)
1.E.Umapathy
2.E.Dilli
3.E.Kotandan
4.Ponnammal .. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 /
Defendant Nos.2 to 5
Panchali (died)
5.Venkatesan
6.Panneerselvam
7.Murugaiyan
8.Thirunavukkarasu
9.Palani .. Respondent Nos.5 to 9 /
Defendant Nos.7 to 11
10.T.Murugammal
11.S.Bakkalammal .. Respondent Nos.10 & 11 /
Plaintiff Nos.1 & 2
12.Vellaiammal
13.Navaneetham
14.Subramaniam .. Respondent Nos.12 to 14 /
Plaintiff Nos.3 to 5
1/4
C.R.P.(NPD)No.2219 of 2008
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 22.04.2008 made in Unnumbered I.A.No. of 2008 (CR.19.No.334/2008) in O.S.No.39 of 1997 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.V, Thiruvallur.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Govindasamy
- petitioner
Deivanayaki
- petitioner
Kumutha
- respondent
E.Umapathy
- respondent
E.Dilli
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court