passed by the Court below, it is necessary to see the prayer sought for in the plaint filed by the plaintiff. In fact, the suit has been filed for the relief of specific performance, in which the plaintiff has to prove the genuineness of the sale agreement, their readiness, willingness and other factors according to Section 16 C of Specific Relief Act. It is admitted on either side that the suit pertains to these Civil Revision Petitions, already posted for both side arguments and at that time, the petitioners have filed these applications. For availing the relief of specific performance, it is not necessary for the plaintiff/petitioner to prove the possession of the property. The physical features now wanted to verify by the petitioner is no way connected and also it is against the relief claimed by them. In this occasion, it is to be noted that the suit is filed in the year of 2011 and it is unnecessary to file such applications belatedly in the year of 2019. The said attitude of the petitioners discloses the fact that they are attempted to collect other evidence by way of appointing the Advocate Commissioner. More than that, the document now required to be received is the document created after the institution of the suit. Further, the documents such as revenue records, copy of the orders passed by this Court and copy of the plaint in OS No.45 of 2016, did not elicit, on what
