Civil revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC was dismissed as infructuous because the suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner, rendering the matter devoid of substantive questions requiring resolution.
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRP NPD No.658 of 2009
M/s Elfotech Electro Chemicals Limited, represented by its Director Kanak Surana, s/o late Gulabchand, 81, 2nd Cross, Sithankudi Street, Puducherry 605 013.
... Petitioner
Vs. Vinod Kumar Jain @ V.K.Jain ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the orders dated 18.12.2007 passed in C.M.A.No.5 of 2006 by the Principal Sub Judge Puducherry, conforming
the order dated 17.04.2006 passed in I.A.No.495 of 2006 in O.S.256 of 2000 by the III Additional District Munsif, Puducherry.
For Revision Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Naveen
N.SATHISH KUMAR. J.,
2
mst
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the suit itself was decreed in favour of the petitioner and hence, nothing survives in this revision petition for further adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition is maintainable and requires further adjudication given that the suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Elfotech Electro Chemicals Limited
Vinod Kumar Jain
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
