This court dismissed a second appeal in default because the appellant's counsel failed to take necessary steps despite adjournment requests, with the matter pending since 2008.
Second appeal dismissed for default. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR
S.A.No.688 of 2008
Pandurangan .... Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs
1.The District Collector,
rep.by Government of Tamil Nadu,
Thiruvannamalai.
2.The Thasildhar,
Chengam Taluk Office,
Thiruvannamalai.
3.The Revenue Inspector,
Thanipadi, Chengam Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District.
4.Thangavel Gounder
.... Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER: Second Appea l filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 04.02.2008 in A.S.No.38 of 2006 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Thiruvannamalai, confirming the decree and Judgment dated 25.01.2006 in O.S.No.356 of 2004 on the file of Additional District Munsif, Chengam.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Rajarajan For respondents : Mr.N.Manikandan, Government Advocate (CS) for R1 to R3. Mr.Krishna Prasad for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R4.
O R D E R
It is seen from records that the matter is being adjourned from the month of February at the request of the learned Counsel for the appellant for taking steps and subsequently, the matter has been posted today for taking
steps finally. Even today, the learned Counsel for the appellant has not taken any steps and sought for an adjournment. Further, it is seen that the matter is pending from the year 2008.
2.Hence, this Second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(insp cell)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ay
To
1.The District Collector,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Thiruvannamalai.
2.The Thasildhar,
Chengam Taluk Office,
Thiruvannamalai.
3.The Revenue Inspector,
Thanipadi, Chengam Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District.
4.The Principal Sub Court,
Thiruvannamalai.
5.The Additional District Munsif,
Chengam.
+1 cc to spl Government Pleader Sr.No. 25997
+1cc toM/s.Sarvabhauman Associates , Advocate SR.No.26205
S.A.No.688 of 2008 A.SK(22/07/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal disposed of due to lack of steps by the appellant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pandurangan
District Collector, rep.by Government of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvannamalai
Thasildhar, Chengam Taluk Office, Thiruvannamalai
Revenue Inspector, Thanipadi
Thangavel Gounder
N. Sathishkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
