Single judge order dismissing a civil revision petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear or take notice of respondents since 2011.
Revision petition and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRP NPD No.1652 of 2011 and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
Shakuntala Ammal (deceased ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. S.Baskaran
2. S.Sankar
3. S.Balasundaram
4. Chamundeshwari
Cause title amended vide order dated
25.04.2011 in M.P.No.2/2011 in
CRPSR.52921/2010. ... Respondents
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of
Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 15.03.2010 passed in E.P.No.9 of 2005 in O.S.No.300 of 1994 by the I District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR. J., mst
For Revision Petitioner : No appearance.
O R D E R
When the matter is listed today, no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. The revision petitioner has not taken notice to the respondentd from the year 2011. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. The connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
20.03.2019
mst Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking order/non-speaking order
To
CRP NPD No.1652 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shakuntala Ammal
S.Baskaran
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
