Allowed

Pudur Periya Pallivasal v. Tamilnadu Waqf Board

Madras HC22 Feb 2019CRP/650/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pudur Periya Pallivasal filed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an order of the Waqf Tribunal permitting the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board to conduct elections. The High Court disposed of the petition upholding the Tribunal's decision and closing connected petitions.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition and connected miscellaneous petitions were disposed of allowing the Waqf Board's action.

Pudur Periya Pallivasal Vs Tamilnadu… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22.02.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

C.R.P.No.650 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.4330, 4326, 4332 of 2019 Pudur Periya Pallivasal, represented by its Secretary, Mr.A.Abdullah, Pudur, Ilayangudi, Sivagangai District – 630 709. .... Petitioner Vs 1.Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Rep.by its Chairman, Having Office at No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Behind Custom Office, Chennai – 1. 2.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Behind Custom Office, Chennai – 1.

¶7

3.The Superintendent of Waqf, Office of the Superintendent of Waqf, Madurai & Ramanad District, (i/c),

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

¶10

No.159/3, Therpasayanam Road, Vellipattinam, Ramanathapuram. 4.Mr.Y.Mohammed

¶11

5.Mr.Khader Gani

¶12

(amended as per I.A.No.38 of 2010, order dated 31.01.2019) .... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 13.02.2019 passed in I.A.No.203 of 2018 in O.A.No.162 of 2018 by the Waqf Tribunal, Chennai and allow the Civil Revision petition.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram,
Senior Counsel for
Ms.C.Uma
For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasar Fizel for R1 to R3.
Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahamed for R4
Mr.Gavaskee for R5.
O R D E R

¶15

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order of

¶16

the Waqf Tribunal passed in I.A.No.203 of 2018 in O.A.No.162 of 2018

¶17

which is filed by the revision petitioner for restraining the 1^st respondent

¶18

from conducting election to the Management Committee of the applicant

¶19

Pallivasal during the pendency of the Original Application.

¶20

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶21

¶22

2.They have placed reliance on the scheme decree dated

¶23

28.03.1947 in O.S.No.31 of 1945 with specific reference to clause VII to

¶24

state that it is only an advocate commissioner who can conduct the election of the Pallivasal. It is to be borne in mind that when the decree was formed, the Waqf Act had not been enacted. Today the Waqf Act is in place and a Waqf Tribunal has been established under the Act. This statutory body is responsible for the management of the various Waqfs in the country.

¶25

3.By consent, the parties have agreed that the Waqf Board shall

¶26

conduct the election and it is also reported that the Board has not taken direct management of the petitioner Pallivasal and therefore, there shall

¶27

be an order of Status Quo till the elections are concluded.

¶28

4.Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in the above

¶29

lines. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶30

22.02.2019

¶31

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

¶32

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

P.T. ASHA. J,

a y

1.Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Rep.by its Chairman, Having Office at No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Behind Custom Office, Chennai – 1.

¶39

2.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Behind Custom Office, Chennai – 1.

¶40

3.The Superintendent of Waqf, Office of the Superintendent of Waqf, Madurai & Ramanad District, (i/c), No.159/3, Therpasayanam Road, Vellipattinam, Ramanathapuram.

¶41

C.R.P.No.650 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.4330, 4326, 4332 of 2019

¶42

Dated:22.02.2019

¶43

http://www.judis.nic.in

Pudur Periya Pallivasal v. Tamilnadu Waqf Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pudur Periya Pallivasal v. Tamilnadu Waqf Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Dayalan Vs J.Deepak Gothi

Kalaiyarasi Vs Kasinathan

V.Krishnaveni Vs Mayathal

S.Thangavelu Vs Nagamalai Goundar(Died)

V.M.Jawaharlal Vs K.a.Sheela

K.Kirubakaran Vs [email protected]