V.Krishnaveni v. Mayathal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging a Subordinate Judge's order rejecting an interim application to produce original documents for signature comparison, noting the petitioner could have filed a consolidated application earlier.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition and connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
C.R.P(PD).No.475 of 2019
&
C.M.P.No.3152 of 2019
1.V.Krishnaveni
2.V.Chandirasekar
3.Smt.M.Bharathi ...Petitioners
Vs
1.Smt.Mayathal
2.Smt.Jayanthi
3.R.Vadivelsamy
4.A.Senthil kumar ... Respondents
2
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decreetal order dated 20.07.2018 made in I.A.No.215 of 2018 in O.S.No.11 of 2015 on
the file of the Subordinate Judge, Udumalaipettai.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ishtiaq Ahmed
ORDER
The above Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the
order passed by the Subordinate Judge, Udumalapet in
dismissing the I.A.No.215 of 2018 in O.S.No.11 of 2015 which
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Subordinate Judge rightly dismissed the interim application for production of documents to compare signatures by allowing truncated petitions.
Whether there are any infirmities in the order dismissing the application to compel production of original documents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Krishnaveni
- petitioner
V.Chandirasekar
- petitioner
Smt.M.Bharathi
- respondent
Smt.Mayathal
- respondent
Smt.Jayanthi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court