The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition and closed a connected miscellaneous petition because the sole respondent had died and no legal representatives were brought on record.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as abated; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.626 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
P.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner/ Judgment Debtor Vs. S.Selvaraj ...Respondent/Decree Holder
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the petition and order passed in E.P.No.347 of 2005 in A.C.No.104 of 2003 dated 12.10.2009 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravanan For Respondent : Not ready in notice
O R D E R
Mr.S.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the sole respondent had died long back and no steps have been taken so far to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent.
2.In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
//True Copy//
va To
The I Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.
C.R.P.No.626 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 A.SK(15/11/2019)
P. Thiyagarajan
S. Selvaraj
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
