M.P.Sureshkumar v. B.Vijayalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as abated due to death of the sole petitioner without substitution of legal representatives.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.11.2019 CORAM : The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.No.542 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
M.P.Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner/Defendant
Vs.
B.Vijayalakshmi ... Respondent/Plaintiff
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 28.01.2010 in E.A.No.9232 of 2009 in E.P.No.1946 of 2008 in O.S.No.4967 of 2002 passed by the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kanniah For Respondent : not ready in notice O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the sole petitioner had died long back and that no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased sole petitioner.
2.In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.P. Suresh Kumar
- respondent
B. Vijayalakshmi
Coram
M. Duraiswamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court