M Tamilselvi v. K Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought punishment for alleged violation of an earlier order in W.P.No.9905 of 2001. The court observed that the respondent had complied with the said order and consequently closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed due to compliance with the earlier order.
What the court decided
Contempt Petition No.1574 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
Cont.P.No.1574 of 2010
M.Tamilselvi ... Petitioner
Vs.
K.Ganesan,
The Secretary to Government,
Higher Education Department (C1),
Secretariat,
Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for violating the
order passed by this Court in W.P.No.9905 of 2001 dated
10.07.2009.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singgaravelan
for Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan
For Respondent : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi
Government Advocate
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing,
Mr.R.Singgaravelan, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for
the petitioner submitted that the respondent had complied
with the order of this Court made in W.P.No.9905 of 2001
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dated 10.07.2009.
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Tamilselvi
- respondent
K. Ganesan, The Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department (C1), Secretariat, Chennai
Coram
M. Duraismamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court