Krishnakumari v. S.Sridhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to set aside returns was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner's representation despite multiple adjournments.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.R.P.No.4299 of 2013
1. Tmt. Krishnakumari
2. Balamurugan .. Petitioners
Vs.
1. S.Sridhar
2. The Branch Manager,
Indian Bank,
Pudupattu Village,
Pannurpet,
Tiruvallur District. .. Respondents
Prayer : - The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India to set aside the returns made in the unnumbered
O.S.S.R.No.6445 of 2012 pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruvallur
dated 17.08.2012.
For the petitioner : No appearance
2
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tmt. Krishnakumari
- petitioner
Balamurugan
- respondent
S.Sridhar
- respondent
The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Pudupattu Village
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court