Palaniammal v. T.Sumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :…
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.R.P.(PD).No.3942 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Palaniammal ... Petitioner Vs. T.Sumathi ... Respondent
Prayer :- The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 21.06.2013 passed in I.A.No.130 of 2013 in O.S.No.91 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodumudi.
For Petitioner : No appearance ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There
is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion on 28.01.2019, there was no representation on the side of the
petitioner. The matter is listed under the caption “for Adjourned Admission” from 2013 onwards. Since there is no representation on the side of the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Palaniammal
- respondent
T.Sumathi
Coram
Abdul Qaddafi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court