Sivasubramanian v. Suganthi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous for default, after noting it had remained pending admission since 2013 without purpose.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.R.P.(PD).No.4289 of 2013
and
M.P.no.1 of 2013
Sivasubramanian ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Suganthi
2.Sivakarunakaran ... Respondents
Prayer :- The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2013 passed in I.A.No.995 of 2011 in O.S.No.433 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Kangayam.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Dhanasekaran
ORDER
It is represented by the learned junior counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.S.Dhanasekaran for the petitioner that the matter have
now become infructuous and seeks time to get written instructions
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be disposed of as infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sivasubramanian
- respondent
Suganthi
- respondent
Sivakarunakaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court