The Supreme Court dismissed the civil revision petition as withdrawn by the petitioners after granting permission for withdrawal. No substantive legal propositions were discussed.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD) No.4072 of 2014
and
MP No.1 of 2014
1. N. Dhanalakshmi
2. V. Parvathi
3. V. Meera and
4. V. Malliga .... Petitioners
versus
S. Muthulakshmi ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 16.10.2014 made in I.A. No.1481 of 2014 in O.S.No.172 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Munsif at Maduranthagam
For Petitioners : Mr.R. Thiagarajan
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sagadevan
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Accordingly, Civil
2
Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
12.07.2019
Index: Yes/ No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
vsi2
To
The District Munsif,
Maduranthagam.
3
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
CRP (PD) No.4072 of 2014
12.07.2019
N. Dhanalakshmi
V. Parvathi
V. Meera
V. Malliga
S. Muthulakshmi
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
