High Court dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous since the underlying suit had been disposed of without any money claim surviving for adjudication.
Civil revision petition set aside as infructuous and connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD) No.3768 of 2014
and
MP No.1 of 2014
M. Padmachand .... Petitioner
versus
1. Prasanna Guru Trust,
(The administrative body of
Sri Prasanna Vinayagar Temple),
Rep. By Managing Trusteee
C.K. Vijendra
2. Muthulakshmi Karunagaran ..... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order passed in I.A. No.1863 of 2013 in O.S. No.343 of 2009, dated 01.08.2014 pending on the file of District Munsif Court, Ambattur by allowing this Civil revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vijay
For Respondents : Mr.L.Prabakar for R1
R2 – No appearance
2
vsi2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
ORDER
It is represented by learned counsel for both sides that the suit has been disposed of and nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter.
CRP (PD) No.3768 of 2014
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition survives after disposal of the underlying suit.
Whether the prescribed Article under which the revision petition is filed is correctly stated
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Padmachand
Prasanna Guru Trust
Muthulakshmi Karunagaran
Abdul Qudhhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Abdul Qudhhose
Parties & counsel
