Dr.Rajalakshmi v. Rojabanu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed civil revision petitions under Article 226 seeking withdrawal. The court accepted the request and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petitions dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.07.2019
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.R.P.(PD) Nos.2749 & 2750 of 2014 &
M.P.No.1 of 2014
1.Dr.Rajalakshmi
2.Dr.Tamilarasan ... Petitioners
Vs.
Rojabanu ... Respondent
COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 04.03.2014 in I.A.Nos.106 & 105 of 2014 in O.S.No.108 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Chidambaram.
For Petitioners in both C.R.Ps. ... Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri, for M/s. G.Rajan
2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE. J,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. Rajalakshmi
- petitioner
Dr. Tamilarasan
- respondent
Rojabanu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court