V.Aishwarya v. S.Saikrishna
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution, directed the Subordinate Judge to dispose of a Hindu Marriage Act petition within nine months due to continuous delays and the need for alternate life arrangements.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram to dispose of HMOP.No.294 of 2015 within nine months.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.3474 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. PONGIAPPAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.3474 of 2019
V.Aishwarya ... Petitioner
vs.
S.Saikrishna ...Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram to dispose the HMOP.No.294 of 2015 within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Anilkumar
O R D E R
The petitioner in HMOP.No.294 of 2015 on the file of the
learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram is the petitioner herein, who has
preferred this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the Subordinate Judge to dispose of the matrimonial petition within a stipulated timeframe to prevent prejudice.
Whether a time-bound direction for disposal is necessary when continuous adjournments are sought by the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Aishwarya
- respondent
S. Saikrishna
Coram
R. Pongiappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court