Dismissed

Vijay Home Appliances Ltd. v. Life Insurance of India

Madras HC6 Mar 2019CRP/3008/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel had endorsed its abandonment, thereby closing the connected miscellaneous petition as well.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition (C.R.P.) and the connected Miscellaneous Petition (M.P.) were dismissed/closed as infructuous without costs.

Vijay Home Appliances Ltd. Vs Life Insurance… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 06.03.2019

¶4

Coram:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

C.R.P.(NPD)No.3008 of 2008 and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
Vijay Home Appliances Ltd.,
No.93, Bharath Building,
Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002. .. Petitioner
versus
1.Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Southern Zonal Office,
LIC Building,
Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002.
2.The Estate Officer,
LIC of India,
Southern Zonal Office,
LIC Buildings,
Chennai – 600 002. .. Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.12.2007 made in C.M.A.No.101 of 2006 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Chennai, confirming the order dated 19.07.2006 passed by the Estate Officer, LIC of India, Southern Zonal Office, LIC Buildings, Chennai – 600 002, the second respondent herein, filed under Section 5(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Thilagaraj

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.12.2007 made in C.M.A.No.101 of 2006 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Chennai, confirming the order dated 19.07.2006 passed by the Estate Officer, LIC of India, Southern Zonal Office, LIC Buildings, Chennai – 600 002, the second respondent herein, filed under Section 5(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction Unauthorized Occupants) Act,

¶13

¶14

2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner

¶15

submitted that this petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶16

3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶17

06.03.2019

¶18

Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes sri

¶19

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶20

¶21

¶22

The Principal District Judge, Chennai.

¶23

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶24

¶25

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J., sri

¶26

C.R.P.(NPD)No.3008 of 2008
and M.P.No.1 of 2008

¶27

06.03.2019

¶28

http://www.judis.nic.in

Vijay Home Appliances Ltd. v. Life Insurance of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Home Appliances Ltd. v. Life Insurance of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Subramanian Vs Rasayal

Komarasamy Gounder Vs Nallappa Gounder

Vs

Charchaman Mosque Vs Dastagir

Kalavathi Vs K.M.Ahamadullah Basha

T.Boopathy Vs T.Saravana Kumar