Civil revision petition filed under Article 226 challenging adjournment orders. The High Court dismissed the petition as the underlying suit issue was decided on merits, rendering it infructuous.
Civil Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRP NPD No.1699 of 2008
Charchaman Mosque,
represented by Secretary of Executive Committee,
No.26, Appu Mudali Street, Mylapore,
Chennai-4. ... Petitioner
Vs.
Dastagir ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the periodical adjournment orders lastly dated 13.03.2008 in E.P.No.179 of 2000 in Ejt. Suit No.9 of 1991 made by the II Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
For Revision Petitioner : M/s N.A.Nissar Ahamed
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR. J., mst
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submit that the issue between the parties is decided on merit and hence, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.
CRP NPD No.1699 of 2008
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Charchaman Mosque
Dastagir
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
