Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous, holding that since the underlying suit was already decreed, no substantive cause for revision survived.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.03.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.(PD) No.1944 of 1999 & C.M.P.No.10519 of 1999
- Mr.Sheik Ibrahim Sahib(Deceased)
- Mrs.Shadhathi Bibi
- Mr.Thameen Ansar
Petitioners 2 and 3 brought on record as
LRs of the deceased sole petitioner vide
Order of Court dated 23.04.2015 made in CMP.Nos.11897, 118988, 11899 of 2000 in CRP.No.1944 of 1999
- Mrs.Mahaboob Bivi
2. Mrs.Ansar Bivi
3. Mr.Kaleesha
4. Mr.Mustafa
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition filed against a final decretal order is maintainable when the underlying suit has been fully decreed.
Whether a civil revision petition is infructuous when the decree in the underlying suit is already final.
Whether a connected miscellaneous petition should be closed when the main revision petition is dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. Sheik Ibrahim Sahib Deceased
- petitioner
Mrs. Shadhathi Bibi
- petitioner
Mr. Thameen Ansar
- respondent
Mahaboob Bivi
- respondent
Ansar Bivi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court