Dismissed

S.Venkatachalam v. S.Dharmalingam

Madras HC3 Dec 2019CRP/3915/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of an interim injunction application. The court held that the petitioner suppressed the existence of a pending partition suit involving the same property where a status-quo order was already in place, making the present injunction application impermissible.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

S.Venkatachalam Vs S.Dharmalingam — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRP.(PD).No.3915 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 03.12.2019

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRP.(PD).No.3915 of 2019
and
C.M.P.No.25846 of 2019
S.Venkatachalam ... Petitioner
Versus
S. Dharmalingam ... Respondent

¶7

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order of the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore dated 04.11.2019 passed in C.M.A.No.20 of 2019 confirming fair and decreetal order passed by the I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore in I.A.No.481 of 2018 in O.S.No.654 of 2018 dated 28.08.2018.

¶8

For petitioner : Mr. T. Venkateshkumar
ORDER

¶9

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order

¶10

dismissing the petitioner's application filed under Order XXXIX, Rule 1

¶11

and 2 CPC seeking for temporary injunction. The petitioner herein

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

1/4

¶14

CRP.(PD).No.3915 of 2019

¶15

filed a suit in O.S.No.654 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Coimbatore against the respondent herein for permanent injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from disturbing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Along with the suit, the petitioner herein field an application for interim injunction. The trial Court, by an order dated 28.08.2018 dismissed the application. Aggrieved over the same, petitioner filed an C.M.A.No.20 of 2019 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore. The Lower Appellate Court after considering the entire materials, by an order dated 04.11.2019 dismissed the appeal. Challenging the same, the present revision has been filed.

¶16

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on records carefully.

¶17

From a perusal of the records, it could be seen that in respect of the very same property, the respondent herein has already filed a suit for partition in O.S.No.1493 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, in which, the petitioner herein is the third defendant and an order of status-quo was passed in I.A.No.1405 of 2015 in the said suit and the same is still pending. Suppressing the above fact the petitioner has filed the present suit for injunction, the Courts below after considering the materials rightly dismissed the http://www.judis.nic.in

¶18

2/4

¶19

CRP.(PD).No.3915 of 2019

¶20

application, holding that already an interim order has been passed in respect of the very same property in the suit filed by the respondent herein for partition, the petitioner is not entitled for injunction in the present suit. I find no irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the Courts below and I find no merit in the Revision Petition.

¶21

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 03.12.2019 Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking/Non-Speaking order mrp To

¶22

I The Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore

¶23

The Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

3/4

¶26

CRP.(PD).No.3915 of 2019

¶27

V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶28

mrp

¶29

CRP.(PD).No.3915of 2019
03.12.2019

¶30

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶31

4/4

S.Venkatachalam v. S.Dharmalingam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Venkatachalam v. S.Dharmalingam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanalakshmi Vs Murugesan

Balaji Vs D.Ramesh

Pushpa Vs M.Adbul Kadar

Ranjan Vs S. Kaladevi

Ilakkia Singaram Vs N.Senthil Arasu Pandian

K.M.Vishnu Priya Vs E.Nithyanandh