Chandra v. Anbukkarasan
Case brief
What is this about?
Order granting two months extension to the Subordinate Judge, Attur, to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.16 of 2002 citing witness attendance and judge unavailability.
What did the court decide?
Granted two months time to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.16 of 2002 from the date of receipt of the order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Sixth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD).No.2693 of 2015
AND M.P.No.1 of 2015
CHANDRA [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS]
Vs
ANBUKKARASAN [RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS]
Petitions under Article 227, constitution of India, filed against the fair and final order dated 10-03-2015 made in Tr.O.P.No.171 of 2014 – on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem (IN C.R.P.(PD).No.2693/2015) and
(ii)To stay all further proceedings pursuant to the fair and final order dated 10/03/2015 made in Tr.O.P.NO.171 of 2014 - on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem (IN M.P.No.1/2015) pending disposal of the above C.R.P.(PD).No.2693/2015.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chandra
- respondent
Anbuffkarasan
Coram
V.M.Velumani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court