The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had been settled by the parties and subsequently dismissed by the trial court, leaving no subsistence for adjudication.
Civil Revision Petition No.2349 of 2015 and connected M.P. No.1 of 2015 dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06..12..2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2349 OF 2015
AND
M.P.NO.1 OF 2015
R.R.Infopark Private Limited,
RR Tower III, Thiru. Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. ... Petitioner
-Versus-
by its Managing Partner,
K.R. Appavoo, 76, By-Pass Road, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056.
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 12.03.2015 made in I.A.No.23 of 2015 in O.S.No.3 of 2011 by the learned III Additional District Judge, Thiruvallur at Poonamallee.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ganesan
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan
ORDER
When this revision petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pending revision, the subject matter of dispute in the suit had been settled between the parties amicably and the suit was also dismissed by the trial court. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, nothing survives in this revision petition for further adjudication.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kmk
To
1. The III Additional District Judge,
Poonamalee, Thiruvallur Dist.
Civil Revision Petition
No.2349 of 2015
CP(CO)
CS/24/01/2020
R.R. Infopark Private Limited
Omega Piling Rigs
Rudradev Aviation Private Limited
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
