Chellammal v. Kuppusamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 09..12..2019 CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

Civil Revision Petition Nos.2594 & 2595 of 2015

and M.P.No.1 of 2015

C.R.P.No.2594 of 2015
1.Chellammal
2.Murugesan
3.Thangavel
: Petitioners/Petitioners
-Versus-
1.Kuppusamy
2.Nachimuthu : Respondents/Respondents
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, praying to set aside the order dated 26.11.2014 made in
Tr.O.P.No.12 of 2014 by the learned Principal District Judge,
Erode.
C.R.P.No.2595 of 2015
1.Chellammal
2.Murugesan
3.Thangavel : Petitioners/Petitioners
-Versus-
1.Palanisamy
2.Kuppusamy
3.Subbana Gounder
4.Easwaramoorthy
5.Nachimuthu : Respondents/Respondents
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, praying to set aside the order dated 26.11.2014 made in
Tr.O.P.No.13 of 2014 by the learned Principal District Judge,
Erode.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Kesavan for
petitioners in both CRPs

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

COMMON ORDER

When these revision petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the reliefs sought for in the revision petitions have become infructuous and therefore, he submitted that the revision petitions may be dismissed as infructuous.