M.Nagarajan v. K.Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit was decreed on 13.12.2017, rendering the challenge obsolete.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected MP closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 17..12..2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Civil Revision Petition No.2689 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.M.Nagarajan
2.Smt.Mariammal
... Petitioners -Versus... Respondent
K.Selvaraj ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 05.08.2014 made I.A.No.521 of 2013 in O.S.No.725 of 2005 by the learned II Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan
ORDER
When this civil revision petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the suit itself has been decreed on 13.12.2017 and therefore, nothing survives in this revision petition for adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Nagarajan
- petitioner
Smt. Mariammal
- respondent
K. Selvaraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court