Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 was dismissed on the day of hearing because the petitioner submitted that the matter was settled out of Court and sought permission to withdraw.
Withdrawal of the Civil Revision Petition allowed; Petition dismissed; Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
C.R.P.No.3521 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
Byrappa .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Pramila
2. Sudha
3. Geetha
4. Roopesh
5. Choodappa
6. Munuswamappa .. Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order of
the learned Subordinate Judge, Hosur dated 28.07.2015 made in
I.A.No.10/2015 in O.S.No.183/2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bharathkumar
For Resondents1,4 &5: Mr.R.Jayaprakash
R2 & R2 : NA
O R D E R
Present revision is filed against the order dated
28.07.2015, made in I.A.No.10 of 2015 in O.S.No.183 of 2014 on
the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Hosur.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-Insp.cell)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To The Subordinate Judge, Hosur.
+1cc to Mr.R.Bharathkumar, Advocate SR.No.104933
C.R.P.No.3521 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
MP(CO) GMY(28/01/2020)
Byrappa
Pramila
Sudha
Geetha
Roopesh
Choodappa
V.BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
