Mangaya Arasi v. S.Ramajayam
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Madras dismissed Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India as withdrawn by petitioner with liberty to determine property market value.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate petition for determination of market value of property.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 17..12..2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Civil Revision Petition No.4159 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.27096 of 2019
Mangaya Arasi
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.Dr.S.Ramajayam
2.Raju
3.Ravi
4.Padma
5.Manimegalai
6.Kala
7.Jeyabalan
8.Raveendren
9.Manokaran
10.Anandavalli @ Rani ... Respondent/Defendant/
Respondents 7 to 10
Petition filed under Article 227of The Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 04.09.2019 made in I.A.No.226 of 2015 in O.S.No.165 of 2014 by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy
ORDER
When this civil revision petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the revision petition with a liberty to file an appropriate petition to determine the actual market value of the suit property, and therefore, he sought permission of this court to withdraw the revision petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mangaya Arasi
- respondent
Dr.S.Ramajayam
- respondent
Raju
- respondent
Ravi
- respondent
Padma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court