Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC filed by an accused in a murder case. The petitioner did not appear, and previous bail petitions were dismissed. The court dismissed the petition noting no change in circumstances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Ninth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.6856 of 2019
JOSE ANANTH SINGH ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6
Vs
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANAKUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.356/2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondent : Mr.S.CHANDRASEKAR, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 449 and 302 of I.P.C. @ 147, 148, 120(b), 212, 449 and 302 of I.P.C., in Crime No.356 of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail.
2
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
MS/VR/SAR-3/27.05.2019/2P.3C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail shall be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 449 and 302 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jose Ananth Singh
State Rep.By The Inspector Of Police Panakudi
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
