Allowed

Ellis Murugan, S/O.Rajendran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 May 2019CRL OP(MD)/6830/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, an accused in a September 456 IPC case, subject to stringent conditions including bond deposit, daily police appearance, and appearance before the concerned Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, deposit of Rs. 15,000/-, daily police appearance, and appearance before Magistrate within 15 days.

Ellis Murugan, S/O.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Eighth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6830 of 2019

¶7

ELLIS MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No-1

¶8

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

¶9

Crime No.371 of 2019 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.AJMALKHAN Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : Mrs.S.BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.I, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 436 of IPC in Crime No.371 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶16

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that stringent condition may be imposed.

¶17

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai, and on each of them https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the

¶18

¶19

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) to the credit of Crime number before the concerned Judicial Magistrate Court, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall appear before the respondent police daily twice at 10.30 a.m. and 5.00 p.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶21

sd/08/05/2019

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO V, MADURAI.

¶26

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶27

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

¶28

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

+1. CC to Mr.S.A.AJMALKHAN Advocate SR.No.8085

¶30

ORDER

¶31

¶32

CRL OP(MD) No.6830 of 2019 Date :08/05/2019 TK/JC/SAR-4/09.05.2019/2P/6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ellis Murugan, S/O.Rajendran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ellis Murugan, S/O.Rajendran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Jerold Jebadurai Vs the Controller of Examination

M.Mohammed Mohsin Vs the Registrar

Santhi, Vs the Honourable

Govindhasamy, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

A.Baskar,S/O.Arumairaj, Vs the State through

Duraisamy Vs the District Collector