Allowed

Govindhasamy, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 May 2019CRL OP(MD)/6744/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court,危险性 was granted anticipatory bail to Govindhasamy and Kamala, who were accused in a crime involving offences under Sections 174(3), 298(A), and 306 of the IPC. The court imposed specific conditions, including appearance before police twice daily and execution of a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail on conditions of executing a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties and appearing before police twice daily.

Govindhasamy, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Eighth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6744 of 2019

¶7

1 GOVINDHASAMY

¶8

2 KAMALA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED

¶9

RANK NOT KNOWN

¶10

¶11

STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

¶12

IN CRIME NO.120/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶13

For Petitioner : MR.S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : MRS.S.BHARATHI,

¶15

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶16

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 174(3) Cr.P.C. @ 298 (A) & 306 of of IPC, in Crime No.120 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶19

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

¶20

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the co-accused/A1 in this case has already been released on bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul in Cr.M.P.No.885 of 2018, dated 07.04.2018.

¶21

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the co-accused has already been released on bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindiugl, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be

¶22

¶23

released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police twice a day at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶24

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶25

sd/08/05/2019

¶26

/ TRUE COPY /

¶27

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.

¶30

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

¶31

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

¶32

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.S.BALA KARTHICK, Advocate SR-8169

¶33

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6744 of 2019 Date :08/05/2019 JM/JC/SAR 4/09.05.2019/2P/6C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Govindhasamy, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govindhasamy, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Jerold Jebadurai Vs the Controller of Examination

M.Mohammed Mohsin Vs the Registrar

Santhi, Vs the Honourable

Ellis Murugan, S/O.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Baskar,S/O.Arumairaj, Vs the State through

Duraisamy Vs the District Collector