In this bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner was arrested for possession of 142 kgs of ganja under the NDPS Act. The court denied bail due to the commercial quantity involved and rejected the claim of false implication, directing completion of trial within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRL OP(MD) No.2922 of 2019
ANAND
... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No. 1
Vs
STATE; REP. BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAIYUR POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO.362 of 2018 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : MR.M.MANIVEL PANDIAN, Advocate for
Mr.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.CHANDRASEKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner, who was arrested on 21.12.2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 25 of NDPS Act in Crime No. 362 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2
sd/26/02/2019 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with commercial quantity of ganja.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
ANAND
STATE
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
