G.E.Moorthy v. a.N.Vasudevan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.02.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.56 of 2013
1.G.E.Moorty
2.Chandravathi .. Plaintiffs / Appellants /
Appellants
Vs.
1.A.N.Vasudevan
2.Lakshmi
3.Muralikrishnan
4.Kumar .. Defendants / Respondents /
Respondents
Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC,
against the judgment and decree of the learned II Additional
Subordinate Judge, Salem, in A.S.No.62 of 2010 dated 20.12.2010
confirming the judgment and decree of the Learned Principal
District Munsif, Salem, in O.S.No.645 of 2008 dated 01.03.2010.
For Appellant .. M/s.J.Prithivi
For Respondent .. Mr.V.Sekar
JUDGMENT
When the Second Appeal came up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the subject matter of the suit has become infructuous and the counsel has also made the following endorsement to that effect:
“As per the instructions from the appellants over phone, the subject matter of the suit has become infructuous. Therefore the appeal may be dismissed as infructuous”.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.E. Moorty
- appellant
Chandravathi
- respondent
A.N. Vasudevan
- respondent
Lakshmi
- respondent
Muralikrishnan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court