Allowed

K. Hari Ram, S/O.Karunai v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Jan 2019CRL OP(MD)/22484/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges under Sections 323, 406, 498(A), and 506(i) IPC for harassment and dowry demand, imposing specific conditions regarding surrender, reporting to police, and preventing tampering.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail upon arrest with execution of bond for Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to five conditions regarding surrender, reporting, and non-interference.

K. Hari Ram, S/O.Karunai Vs the Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty First day of January Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.22484 of 2018

¶7

1 K. HARI RAM, 2 H. VIJAYA, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN)

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CR.NO.6 OF 2018. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498(A) and 506(i) I.P.C in Crime No.6 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused harassed the defacto complainant and demanded more dowry.

¶15

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they had nothing with the alleged crime. He further submits that co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide Crl.O.P.(MD).No.149 of 2019, dated 07.01.2019. Hence, anticipatory bail may be granted to these petitioners.

¶16

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that in this case, co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court and investigation is going on.

¶17

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that co-accused have already been granted https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ anticipatory bail by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions:-

¶18

¶19

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Sivakasi and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

¶20

¶21

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that

¶22

[a] if the petitioners failed to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶23

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.

¶24

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶25

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶26

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶27

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/-

21/01/2019

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

¶33

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, SIVAKASI.

¶34

2 THROUGH:

¶35

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAKASI.

¶36

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶37

ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶38

¶39

4 THE THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶40

+1. CC to M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.982

¶41

CRL OP(MD) No.22484 of 2018

¶42

TR/PN/SAR-IV (24.01.2019) 6C 3P

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K. Hari Ram, S/O.Karunai v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Hari Ram, S/O.Karunai v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Ramar Vs the Inspector of Police

The Management Vs Tmt.Lourdammal

T.K.Krishnasamy, Vs the Regional Transport

M/S.Clear Aqua Technologies Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

Regu, Vs the Inspector of Police

Palani @ Nachipalani, Vs the Inspector of Police