Dismissed

S.Krishnamoorthy, M/a 47 Yrs, v. the Tiruchengode Agricultural

Madras HC13 Jun 2019CRL OP/7705/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice N.Anand Venkatesh dismissed the Criminal Original Petition challenging an interim order in a cheque bounce case. Finding no illegality in the lower court's order, the court directed completion of proceedings within two months and allowed cross-examination.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; lower court directed to complete proceedings in S.T.C.No.218 of 2012 within two months; petitioner dispensed from presence except for cross-examination and Section 313 Cr.P.C. stag

S.Krishnamoorthy, M/a 47 Yrs, Vs the Tiruchengode Agricultural — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.06.2019

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7705 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.3976 of 2018

¶6

S.Krishnamoorthi Proprietor krishna Agency No.20 Deputy Registrar(CJ conf) Thottam, Nathakadaiyur Post, Kangayam Taluk Tiruppur District .. Petitioner/Accused Vs.

¶7

The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., S.351, Rep. by its Authorized and Approved Person, General Manager Incharge P.Mathaiyan .. Respondent/Complainant

¶8

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 27.02.2018 passed in C.M.P.No.824 of 2018 in S.T.C.No.218 of 2012 on the file of the Fast Track Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.B.Singaravelu

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Court below partly allowing the application filed by the petitioner under Section 91 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

2.The petitioner is facing proceedings before the Court below under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act initiated by the respondent. The proceedings were initiated in the year 2012 and it is pending till date.

¶14

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

¶15

4.This Court does not find any illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the Court below and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

5.In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed and the Court below is directed to complete the proceedings in S.T.C.No.218 of 2012 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The presence of the petitioner is dispensed with and he shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross examine the witnesses on the same day they are examined in chief. The petitioner shall be present before the Court below at the time of questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and at the time of final judgment. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vs
To
1.The Fast Track Judicial Magistrate,
Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.
+1cc to Mr. C.Prakasam, Advocate SR.No. 48711
+1cc to Mr.B.Singaravelu , Advocate SR.No. 47372
Crl.O.P.No.7705 of 2018
and
Crl.M.P.No.3976 of 2018
A.SK(08/07/2019)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Krishnamoorthy, M/a 47 Yrs, v. the Tiruchengode Agricultural

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Krishnamoorthy, M/a 47 Yrs, v. the Tiruchengode Agricultural

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Yuvaraja Vs R.Varalakshmi

S.Megala (31 Years) Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Rajkumar Vs Muthulakshmi

S.Arumugam Vs Senior Superintendent of Police

K.Senthilkumar Vs the State Rep.by

The Branch Manager Vs the Inspector of Police