T.Rajkumar v. Muthulakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The respondent police officer appeared with orders complied. No further orders required. The contempt petition is closed.
What did the court decide?
The petition is closed. No further orders passed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Cont.P.No.328 of 2019
Mr.T.Rajkumar, M/35,
S/o.Late, Thangaraj, Proprietor,
Catch Media,
No.23/33, Rajaji Street,
Ayanavaram,
Chennai 600 023.
...Petitioner
Vs.
Mrs.Muthulakshmi,
The Inspector of Police(Crime),
K-2, Ayanavaram Police Station,
Ayanavaram,
Chennai-23.
...Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of the Courts Act may be pleased to punish the
respondent for willful disobeying the order dated
12.09.2018 passed in Crl.O.P.No.22022/2018.
2
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karikalan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on
06.06.2019, the Inspector of Police is present before this
Court along with Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Ayanavaram. It was in the order by this Court that the
postal communication was not properly handled in the police
station and that there was no intention to evade the notice.
2. A counter affidavit has also been filed by the
Inspector of Police wherein it has been stated that
pursuant to the orders passed by this court, the
investigation was completed and a final report was also
filed on 11.06.2019 before the V th Metropolitan Magistrate
Court, Egmore and the same has been taken on filed in
C.C.No.4833 of 2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. T. Rajkumar
- respondent
Mrs. Muthulakshmi
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court