Disposed

The Branch Manager v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2019CRL OP/11805/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition, the petitioner sought direction to the Magistrate to take cognizance of a final report regarding banking fraud which was pending for years. The Court directed the Metropolitan Magistrate to file the report and proceed.

What did the court decide?

Directed the CCB & CBCID Metropolitan Magistrate Court to take the final report on file, take cognizance, and proceed within four weeks.

The Branch Manager Vs the Inspector of Police — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.06.2019

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.11805 of 2019

¶6

The Branch Manager, Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd., Peravallur Branch,

¶7

Rep. by Kuriakose K.J. .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Team 12, Chennai. .. Respondent

¶9

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the Respondent to get the Charge Sheet numbered and pass any such order or orders as it deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R

¶12

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondent to get the final report numbered before the Court below since the same is pending without any progress from the year 2017 onwards.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent.

¶14

3.It is seen from the records that a final report has been filed before the CCB & CBCID Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Allikulam, Chennai in the year 2018 against four accused persons for an offence under Sections 420, 409, 477(A) IPC read with

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Section 34 IPC (4 counts). However till date the Court below has not taken cognizance of the final report and it is kept pending.

¶17

4.There shall be a direction to the CCB & CBCID Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Allikulam, Chennai to take the final report on file and take cognizance and proceed further in accordance with law. This exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

5.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vs
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Central Crime Branch, Team 12,
Chennai.
2.The Metropolitan Magistrate(CCB & CBCID)
Allikulam,
Chennai.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.K.Rajasekaran, Advocate sr.48176

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.11805 of 2019

¶21

nr 02/07/2019

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Branch Manager v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Branch Manager v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Yuvaraja Vs R.Varalakshmi

S.Megala (31 Years) Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Rajkumar Vs Muthulakshmi

S.Krishnamoorthy, M/a 47 Yrs, Vs the Tiruchengode Agricultural

S.Arumugam Vs Senior Superintendent of Police

K.Senthilkumar Vs the State Rep.by