The Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, holding it infructuous because the respondent had already filed an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC based on the petitioner's complaint.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.O.P. No. 31813 of 2019
K. Karthik ...Petitioner
vs
The Inspector of Police,
CCB-II,
O/o. Commissioner of Police,
Chennai. ...Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to take
further action based on the petitioner compliant dated
12.11.2018 in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr. P. Muthamizh selvakumar
For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to
take further action based on the petitioner compliant dated
12.11.2018 in accordance with law.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kv
To
Crl.O.P. No. 31813 of 2019
GN(08/01/2020)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct further action on the petitioner's complaint.
Whether the petition is maintainable given the existence of an FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Karthik
The Inspector of Police, CCB-II, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Chennai
P. Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
