The High Court held the Criminal Original Petition not maintainable as the matter was covered by a prior Division Bench order. Liberty was granted to pursue remedies as directed earlier. The petition was disposed of without interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.O.P.No.25345 of 2019
R.Manimaran ... Petitioner
-Vs-
Dr.Radhakrishnan Road,
Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,
Tiruvarur District-609 608.
3.The Inspector of Police, Peralam Police Station, Tiruvarur District-609 608.
4.The Inspector of Police, Sembanar Koil Police Station, Myladurai Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ... Respondents
[4th respondent is suo-motu impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 21.11.2019 in Crl.O.P.No.25345 of 2019]
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 3rd respondent to take further action against the accused person's name a. Semema Beevi W/o.Manimaran, b. Jeyana Beevi W/o.Arivazhagan, c. Rowdy Jageer Usain @ Senthilkumar S/o.Salam Bai and d. Leema W/o. Ramachandran investigate the case based on complaint dated 10.07.2019 given by the petitioner.
For Petitioner : M/s.B.Chandran
For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
2
3 rd
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to take further action on the petitioner's complaint dated 10.07.2019.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3.This petition is not maintainable, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl.OP(MD) No.13681 of 2018 and a batch of cases, dated 20.09.2018, liberty is given to the petitioner to workout his remedy as per the direction given by the Hon'ble Division Bench.
4.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1 cc to M/s.B.Chandran,Advocate Sr.No. 102884
AKM/23.01.2020/2P-7C/
Crl.O.P.No.25345 of 2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC to direct police action is maintainable after a prior Division Bench order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Crl.OP(MD) No.13681 of 2018Followed¶3
R.Manimaran
Director General of Police
Superintendent of Police
Inspector of Police, Peralam Police Station
Inspector of Police, Sembanar Koil Police Station
P.Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
